Uncle Roger Ebert just posted a “hi-larious” blog entry that women are better than men.  So naturally, in regards to the image industry, I have to mention his contribution: Beneath the Valley of the Ultra-Vixens.  It’s funny, trust me.  Uncle Roger is a breast (and ass man, you’ll get it), and he thinks that’s what young guys want, too.  So the next time you chase after a pair of jumblies, you can thank Uncle Roger for teachin’ you the ways.

I don’t get it, but it’s worth observing. 1980s fashion

To balance out my topics a little. Andrew Loomis is an illustrator who has a very distinctive style when it comes to human anatomy.

The new Sonny and Cher. LOL

What’s hip, what’s new?  Can Anne Hathaway pull it off (live up to Julie Newmar) in the upcoming The Dark Knight Rises as the latest “Catwoman”?

This girl’s all over the place: The Amazing Spider-man, Gangster Squad, etc… Looks amazing as a redhead, huh?  She’s a natural blonde, though.  Can someone explain why certain physical traits work for some and not for all?  If blonde is the standard, why doesn’t it work for Emma Stone, whose career took off because she didn’t play “blonde”?  Explain.

Here’s a beautiful French actress whose typecast is usually that of an exotic ethnic femme.  You can see her in the upcoming Batman film The Dark Knight Rises where she is suspected to be playing the villain Ras Al Ghul’s vengeful daughter Talia.

Question: would casting a really “ethnic” female to play the character (the ethnicity of the fictional villainess isn’t truly defined in the source comics, we just know it’s an ethnicity somewhere in the Middle East) affect whether you watch this film or not?  Why did the filmmakers cast this particular actress?  Use your spider-senses, peeps.